Files
openclaw/docs/plugins/plugin-permission-requests.md
Peter Steinberger 99a02bf115 feat(approvals): typed approval scope summaries on channel cards (#130116)
* feat(approvals): typed approval scope summaries on channel cards

Approval owners can attach a closed ApprovalScope union (message-send,
payment, external-post) describing an action's blast radius. The gateway
sanitizes it once at the producer boundary, the core view model renders a
Scope metadata row so Slack/Discord/Google Chat cards show it unchanged,
shared text builders cover Telegram/WhatsApp/Signal/iMessage/Matrix, and
the durable presentation carries it additively for operator surfaces.
Scope is display-only, never authorization; missing scope keeps today's
cards.

* fix(approvals): emit native ApprovalScope union and clamp recipient previews

Name the three scope variants as registered protocol schemas so the Swift
generator emits the ApprovalScope discriminated union the presentation
structs reference, and commit the regenerated GatewayModels.swift. Clamp
recipient previews to the declared recipientCount at the sanitize boundary
so a count of 1 with 2 previews can no longer render inconsistently.
Addresses both ClawSweeper findings on #130116.

* refactor(approvals): extract text sanitizer to break the exec-approvals import cycle

check:architecture flagged approval-scope joining the exec-approvals SCC
through exec-approval-command-display. Move the self-contained display
sanitizer into a leaf module (exec-approval-text-sanitize) with no
exec-approvals imports and migrate all sanitize importers; command-display
keeps only the payload-typed command/preview resolver.

* chore(plugin-sdk): ratchet public surface budgets down after sanitizer extraction

The approval display sanitizers left the publicly reachable SDK graph when
they moved to the exec-approval-text-sanitize leaf: exports 4343 -> 4338,
callable exports 2582 -> 2578. Shrink-only budget pin.
2026-08-26 12:13:49 -07:00

260 lines
11 KiB
Markdown

---
summary: "Ask users to approve plugin tool calls and plugin-owned permission prompts"
title: "Plugin permission requests"
sidebarTitle: "Permission requests"
read_when:
- You need a plugin hook or tool to ask before a side effect runs
- You need to configure where plugin approval prompts are delivered
- You are deciding between optional tools, exec approvals, and plugin approvals
---
Plugin permission requests let plugin code pause a tool call or plugin-owned
operation until a user approves or denies it. They use the Gateway
`plugin.approval.*` flow and the same approval UI surfaces that handle chat
approval buttons and `/approve` commands.
Use plugin permission requests for plugin/app permissions. They do not replace
host exec approvals, optional tool allowlists, or Codex's native permission
review.
## Choose the right gate
Pick the gate that matches the decision point you need:
| Gate | Use it when | What it controls |
| -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Optional tools | A tool should not be visible to the model until the user opts in. | Tool exposure through `tools.allow`. |
| Plugin permission requests | A plugin hook or plugin-owned operation must ask before one action runs. | Runtime approval through `plugin.approval.*`. |
| Exec approvals | A host command or shell-like tool needs operator approval. | Host exec policy and durable exec allowlists. |
| Codex native permission requests | Codex asks before native shell, file, MCP, or app-server actions. | Codex app-server or native hook approval handling, routed through plugin approvals when OpenClaw owns the prompt. |
| MCP approval elicitations | A Codex MCP server requests approval for a tool call. | MCP approval responses bridged through OpenClaw plugin approvals. |
Optional tools are a discovery-time gate. Plugin permission requests are a
per-call gate. Use both when a sensitive tool should require explicit opt-in
before the model can see it and approval before the action runs.
## Request approval before a tool call
Most plugin-authored prompts should start in a `before_tool_call` hook. The hook
runs after the model selects a tool and before OpenClaw executes it:
```typescript
import { definePluginEntry } from "openclaw/plugin-sdk/plugin-entry";
export default definePluginEntry({
id: "deploy-policy",
name: "Deploy Policy",
register(api) {
api.on("before_tool_call", async (event) => {
if (event.toolName !== "deploy_service") {
return;
}
const environment =
typeof event.params.environment === "string" ? event.params.environment : "unknown";
return {
requireApproval: {
title: "Deploy service",
description: `Deploy service to ${environment}.`,
severity: environment === "production" ? "critical" : "warning",
allowedDecisions:
environment === "production"
? ["allow-once", "deny"]
: ["allow-once", "allow-always", "deny"],
timeoutMs: 120_000,
onResolution(decision) {
console.log(`deploy approval resolved: ${decision}`);
},
},
};
});
},
});
```
Write prompt text for the person who will approve the action:
- Keep `title` short and action-focused; the Gateway caps it at 80 characters.
- Keep `description` specific and bounded; the Gateway caps it at 512
characters.
- Include the action, target, and risk. Do not include secrets, tokens, or
private payloads that should not appear in chat approval surfaces.
- `severity` defaults to `"warning"` when omitted. Use `"critical"` only for
actions where the wrong decision could cause production damage or data loss.
- `allowedDecisions` defaults to `["allow-once", "allow-always", "deny"]` when
omitted. Pass `["allow-once", "deny"]` when persistent trust is unsafe for
that action.
- `timeoutMs` defaults to 120000 (2 minutes) and is capped at 600000 (10
minutes) regardless of the requested value.
## Declare approval scope
Set `requireApproval.scope` when your plugin knows the consequences of an
operation. Scope is typed, optional, and display-only: it helps reviewers
understand the action but never grants permission or changes the approval
decision. The plugin declaring the approval supplies these facts; channels never
infer scope from commands, titles, or message text.
For an email to three external recipients, include the destination, total
recipient count, an optional preview, and the audience:
```typescript
requireApproval: {
title: "Send customer update",
scope: {
kind: "message-send",
target: "email",
recipientCount: 3,
recipients: ["alice@example.com", "bob@example.com"],
audience: "external",
},
}
```
For a payment, provide the exact decimal amount as a string, its currency, and
the payee or payment system:
```typescript
requireApproval: {
title: "Pay invoice",
scope: {
kind: "payment",
amount: "49.99",
currency: "EUR",
target: "Stripe",
},
}
```
For an external post, identify its destination and declare its visibility:
```typescript
requireApproval: {
title: "Publish announcement",
scope: {
kind: "external-post",
target: "github",
visibility: "public",
},
}
```
Message audiences can be `internal` or `external`; external-post visibility can
be `public` or `restricted`. Recipient previews contain at most five identities.
All strings are sanitized and bounded before display: targets and recipient
identities are limited to 128 characters, payment amounts to 40, and currencies
to 12. If sanitization would exceed a bound, OpenClaw omits the scope while
preserving the normal approval prompt.
## Decision behavior
OpenClaw creates a pending approval with a `plugin:` ID, delivers it to the
available approval surfaces, and waits for a decision.
| Decision | Result |
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `allow-once` | The current call continues. |
| `allow-always` | The current call continues and the decision is passed to the plugin. |
| `deny` | The call is blocked with a denied tool result. |
| Timeout | The call is blocked. |
| Cancellation | The call is blocked when the run is aborted. |
| No approval route | The call is blocked because no connected approval surface can resolve it. |
Only the exact `allow-once` and `allow-always` decisions permitted by the
request allow execution. Unknown, malformed, mismatched, missing, and timed-out
decisions fail closed. The legacy `timeoutBehavior` field remains accepted for
plugin compatibility but is deprecated and ignored; do not set it in new hooks.
`allow-always` is only durable when the requesting plugin or runtime implements
that persistence. For ordinary `before_tool_call.requireApproval` hooks,
OpenClaw treats `allow-once` and `allow-always` as approval decisions for the
current call and passes the resolved value to `onResolution`. If your plugin
offers `allow-always`, document and implement exactly what future calls it
trusts.
If the hook also returns `params`, OpenClaw snapshots the base parameters and
those overrides when approval is requested, then applies the overrides only
after approval succeeds. A lower-priority hook can still block, but cannot
rewrite the parameters covered by the pending approval.
`allowedDecisions` limits the buttons and commands shown to the user. The
Gateway rejects a resolve attempt for any decision the request did not offer.
## Route approval prompts
Approval prompts can resolve in local UI surfaces or in chat channels that
support approval handling. To forward plugin approval prompts to explicit chat
targets, configure `approvals.plugin`:
```json5
{
approvals: {
plugin: {
enabled: true,
mode: "targets",
agentFilter: ["main"],
targets: [{ channel: "slack", to: "U12345678" }],
},
},
}
```
`approvals.plugin` is independent from `approvals.exec`. Enabling exec approval
forwarding does not route plugin approval prompts, and enabling plugin approval
forwarding does not change host exec policy.
When a prompt includes manual approval text, resolve it with one of the offered
decisions:
```text
/approve <id> allow-once
/approve <id> allow-always
/approve <id> deny
```
See [Advanced exec approvals](/tools/exec-approvals-advanced#plugin-approval-forwarding)
for the full forwarding model, same-chat approval behavior, native channel
delivery, and channel-specific approver rules.
## Codex native permissions
Codex native permission prompts can also travel through plugin approvals, but
they have different ownership than plugin-authored hooks.
- Codex app-server approval requests route through OpenClaw after Codex review.
- The native hook `permission_request` relay can ask through
`plugin.approval.request` when that relay is enabled.
- MCP tool approval elicitations route through plugin approvals when Codex marks
`_meta.codex_approval_kind` as `"mcp_tool_call"`.
See [Codex harness runtime](/plugins/codex-harness-runtime#native-permissions-and-mcp-elicitations)
for the Codex-specific behavior and fallback rules.
## Troubleshooting
**The tool says plugin approvals are unavailable.** No approval UI or configured
approval route accepted the request. Connect an approval-capable client, use a
channel that supports same-chat `/approve`, or configure `approvals.plugin`.
**`allow-always` appears but the next call prompts again.** The generic plugin
approval flow does not automatically persist trust for arbitrary hooks. Persist
plugin-owned trust in your plugin after `onResolution("allow-always")`, or
offer only `allow-once` and `deny`.
**`/approve` rejects the decision.** The request restricted
`allowedDecisions`. Use one of the decisions printed in the prompt.
**A Discord, Matrix, Slack, or Telegram prompt routes differently from exec
approvals.** Plugin approvals and exec approvals use separate config and may use
different authorization checks. Verify `approvals.plugin` and the channel's
plugin approval support instead of only checking `approvals.exec`.
## Related
- [Plugin hooks](/plugins/hooks#tool-call-policy)
- [Building plugins](/plugins/building-plugins#registering-tools)
- [Advanced exec approvals](/tools/exec-approvals-advanced#plugin-approval-forwarding)
- [Gateway protocol](/gateway/protocol)
- [Codex harness runtime](/plugins/codex-harness-runtime#native-permissions-and-mcp-elicitations)