* fix: enforce the image generation flag on the legacy chat feature path
* fix: refresh the config store when image generation is disabled in admin settings
* fix: hide active feature pills when the feature is no longer available
Revoking a user's `features.memories` permission removed their access to the memories API and to the native function-calling memory tools, but their stored memories were still injected into the system context on the legacy function-calling path.
The branch in `process_chat_payload` only checked the client-supplied `features['memory']` flag plus the global `memories.system_context.enable` switch, with no user-permission check. `add_memory_context` did not compensate: it only checks `model_allows_memory`, which is a model capability rather than a permission, and the one call inside it that does check the permission (`query_memory`) has its 403 swallowed by a `try/except`, so `Memories.get_memories_by_user_id` and the neighbourhood scan still fed the system prompt.
Gate the branch with the same permission check the native path already performs in `get_builtin_tools`, matching the neighbouring `web_search` and `image_generation` branches.
Only the caller's own memories were injected into the caller's own context, so there was no cross-user exposure. The practical effect was that the permission toggle did not do what its name implies: an admin who revoked it still got memory content injected for that user.
Clicking "Merged Response" in a multi-model chat often made the merging model answer with "It appears that the responses provided from the other models were empty".
The merge handler collected each model's answer via `history.messages[id].content`. Assistant messages are persisted by the backend with `output` only (`upsert_message_to_chat_by_id_and_message_id` writes `done`/`role`/`output`, never `content`), so `content` is only populated in the browser session that generated the responses, where the streaming handler mirrors it. Once the chat is reloaded from the database, every assistant message has `content: ''` and the merge request is sent with a list of empty strings, which is exactly what the merging model then reports. That is why the failure looks random: merging works right after generating, and fails after a refresh or when reopening the chat.
Read the responses through `getOutputText(message.output) || message.content`, the same fallback already used by every other read site (`ResponseMessage`, `Overview/Node`, `SearchModal`, `ChatItem`, `ChatMenu`, `Navbar/Menu`).
Fixes#26962
Only the frontend added `stream_options: {include_usage: true}` to the completion payload, gated on the model's `usage` capability. Every backend-initiated run builds its own payload (automations, timers, subagents, channels) and omitted it, so those responses came back without token counts and never rendered the usage block, even with the capability enabled on the model.
Set it in `chat_completion` instead, the single handler all of those callers go through, and drop the two duplicate copies (the Anthropic-compat handler and the frontend). Capabilities are read from the resolved model before the custom-model fallback can rebind it, and the flag is applied after the model's `stream_response` override so a non-streaming model is unaffected.
Fixes#27653
Every action button on a response message gates its visibility on
'isLastMessage || ($settings?.highContrastMode ?? false)' so that buttons
stay visible (not hover-only) when High Contrast mode is on. The two
Regenerate buttons — the one inside RegenerateMenu and the fallback in the
{:else} branch — were missed and still gated on isLastMessage alone, so on
any non-last message the Regenerate icon was invisible until mouse-over even
with High Contrast enabled (#27638).
Add the same highContrastMode clause to both buttons, matching the other
action buttons in this file.
The "expand input" button was positioned with `fixed top-0 right-0`. That only kept it near the composer by accident: `#message-input-container` sets `backdrop-blur-sm`, and a backdrop-filter makes an element the containing block for fixed descendants, so the button resolved to the top-right corner of the entire composer instead of the text area it belongs to.
That corner is already taken. The `@`-tagged model chip renders as the first row of the same container with its dismiss button at the right end, so with a multi-line prompt and a tagged model the two controls are drawn on top of each other. The attached-files row has the same problem: the button paints over the first thumbnail and its remove button.
Anchor the button to the wrapper that holds the text area instead, using `relative`/`absolute`, so it always sits at the top-right of the input row and below whatever rows precede it. With no chip and no files the position is unchanged. As a side effect the button is no longer a child of the `overflow-auto` scroller, so it can no longer be clipped or scrolled out of view on long prompts.
Fixes#26736
Timothy Jaeryang Baek