11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stephan Renatus 0adc621b36 planner: deal with var-for-function replacement in indirect calls
This change still follows the approach thought up in #6996, but now does
it more consistently: the extra args accumulated through (multiple)
with-replacements using variables are now put into the funcstackj, and
consistently affect the planning of functions in "higher" gens.

Fixes #5311.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan@styra.com>
2025-05-16 19:41:47 +02:00
Anders Eknert b942136a4a Use Go 1.22+ int ranges (#7328)
With "some" help from `golangci-lint run --fix ./...`

Signed-off-by: Anders Eknert <anders@styra.com>
2025-01-30 09:57:27 +01:00
Johan Fylling 7bb6dbe36b Preparing for v1 API
Moving (most) source to v1 root package to prepare for v0/v1 API separation.

Signed-off-by: Johan Fylling <johan.dev@fylling.se>
2024-12-12 15:09:03 +01:00
Johan Fylling c9d1a8db1f planner: Adding support for general ref rule heads (#6235)
Fixes: #5995

Signed-off-by: Johan Fylling <johan.dev@fylling.se>
2023-09-27 14:06:19 +02:00
Stephan Renatus f4af919b6f planner: fix bug in call_dynamic with overlapping ref rules
Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan@styra.com>
2023-04-24 11:40:57 -07:00
Stephan Renatus 0e6cb8808c planner: fix ref heads processing (#5418)
With the introduction of ref heads in #4660, the planned IR
still mostly worked, but it was bypassing the CallDynamic
optimization when it shouldn't have.

This commit re-works some of the rule planning to more robustly
handle ref heads.

Also adds a few test cases to get a grip on what should and
should not happen.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan.renatus@gmail.com>
2022-11-28 20:31:05 +01:00
Stephan Renatus 965301f90e ast: support dotted heads (#4660)
This change allows rules to have string prefixes in their heads -- we've
come to call them "ref heads".

String prefixes means that where before, you had

    package a.b.c
    allow = true

you can now have

    package a
    b.c.allow = true

This allows for more concise policies, and different ways to structure
larger rule corpuses.

Backwards-compatibility:

- There are code paths that accept ast.Module structs that don't necessarily
  come from the parser -- so we're backfilling the rule's Head.Reference
  field from the Name when it's not present.
  This is exposed through (Head).Ref() which always returns a Ref.

  This also affects the `opa parse` "pretty" output:

  With x.rego as

    package x
    import future.keywords
    a.b.c.d if true
    e[x] if true

  we get

    $ opa parse x rego
    module
     package
      ref
       data
       "x"
     import
      ref
       future
       "keywords"

     rule
      head
       ref
        a
        "b"
        "c"
        "d"
       true
      body
       expr index=0
        true
     rule
      head
       ref
        e
        x
       true
      body
       expr index=0
        true

  Note that

    Name: e
    Key: x

  becomes

    Reference: e[x]

  in the output above (since that's how we're parsing it, back-compat edge cases aside)

- One special case for backcompat is `p[x] { ... }`:

    rule                    | ref   | key | value | name
    ------------------------+-------+-----+-------+-----
    p[x] { ... }            | p     | x   | nil   | "p"
    p contains x if { ... } | p     | x   | nil   | "p"
    p[x] if { ... }         | p[x]  | nil | true  | ""

  For interpreting a rule, we now have the following procedure:

  1. if it has a Key, it's a multi-value rule; and its Ref defines the set:

     Head{Key: x, Ref: p} ~> p is a set
     ^-- we'd get this from `p contains x if true`
         or `p[x] { true }` (back compat)

  2. if it has a Value, it's a single-value rule; its Ref may contain vars:

     Head{Ref: p.q.r[s], Value: 12} ~> body determines s, `p.q.r.[s]` is 12
     ^-- we'd get this from `p.q.r[s] = 12 { s := "whatever" }`

     Head{Key: x, Ref: p[x], Value: 3} ~> `p[x]` has value 3, `x` is determined
                                          by the rule body
     ^-- we'd get this from `p[x] = 3 if x := 2`
         or `p[x] = 3 { x := 2 }` (back compat)

     Here, the Key isn't used, it's present for backwards compatibility: for ref-
     less rule heads, `p[x] = 3` used to be a partial object: key x, value 3,
     name "p"

- The destinction between complete rules and partial object rules disappears.
  They're both single-value rules now.

- We're now outputting the refs of the rules completely in error messages, as
  it's hard to make sense of "rule r" when there's rule r in package a.b.c and
  rule b.c.r in package a.

Restrictions/next steps:

- Support for ref head rules in the REPL is pretty poor so far. Anything that
  works does so rather accidentally. You should be able to work with policies
  that contain ref heads, but you cannot interactively define them.
  
  This is because before, we'd looked at REPL input like

      p.foo.bar = true

  and noticed that it cannot be a rule, so it's got to be a query. This is no
  longer the case with ref heads.

- Currently vars in Refs are only allowed in the last position. This is expected
 to change in the future.

- Also, for multi-value rules, we can not have a var at all -- so the following
  isn't supported yet:

      p.q.r[s] contains t if { ... }

-----

Most of the work happens when the RuleTree is derived from the ModuleTree -- in
the RuleTree, it doesn't matter if a rule was `p` in `package a.b.c` or `b.c.p`
in `package a`.

As such, the planner and wasm compiler hasn't seen that many adaptations:

- We're putting rules into the ruletree _including_ the var parts, so

  p.q.a = 1
  p.q.[x] = 2 { x := "b" }

  end up in two different leaves:

  p
  `-> q
       `-> a = 1
       `-> [x] = 2`

- When planing a ref, we're checking if a rule tree node's children have
  var keys, and plan "one level higher" accordingly:

  Both sets of rules, p.q.a and p.q[x] will be planned into one function
  (same as before); and accordingly return an object {"a": 1, "b": 2}

- When we don't have vars in the last ref part, we'll end up planning
  the rules separately. This will have an effect on the IR.

  p.q = 1
  p.r = 2

  Before, these would have been one function; now, it's two. As a result,
  in Wasm, some "object insertion" conflicts can become "var assignment
  conflicts", but that's in line with the now-new view of "multi-value"
  and "single-value" rules, not partial {set/obj} vs complete.
* planner: only check ref.GroundPrefix() for optimizations

In a previous commit, we've only mapped

    p.q.r[7]

as p.q.r;  and as such, also need to lookup the ref

    p.q.r[__local0__]

via p.q.r

(I think. Full disclosure: there might be edge cases here that are unaccounted
for, but right now, I'm aiming for making the existing tests green...)


New compiler stage:

In the compiler, we're having a new early rewriting step to ensure that the
RuleTree's keys are comparible. They're ast.Value, but some of them cause us
grief:

- ast.Object cannot be compared structurally; so

      _, ok := map[ast.Value]bool{ast.NewObject([2]*ast.Term{ast.StringTerm("foo"), ast.StringTerm("bar")}): true}[ast.NewObject([2]*ast.Term{ast.StringTerm("foo"), ast.StringTerm("bar")})]

  `ok` will never be true here.

- ast.Ref is a slice type, not hashable, so adding that to the RuleTree would
  cause a runtime panic:

      p[y.z] { y := input }

  is now rewritten to

    p[__local0__] { y := input; __local0__ := y.z }

This required moving the InitLocalVarGen stage up the chain, but as it's still
below ResolveRefs, we should be OK.

As a consequence, we've had to adapt `oracle` to cope with that rewriting:

1. The compiler rewrites rule head refs early because the rule tree expects
   only simple vars, no refs, in rule head refs. So `p[x.y]` becomes
   `p[local] { local = x.y }`
2. The oracle circles in on the node it's finding the definition for based
   on source location, and the logic for doing that depends on unaltered
   modules.

So here, (2.) is relaxed: the logic for building the lookup node stack can
now cope with generated statements that have been appended to the rule bodies.


There is a peculiarity about ref rules and extents:

See the added tests: having a ref rule implies that we get an empty object
in the full extent:

    package p
    foo.bar if false

makes the extent of data.p: {"foo": {}}

This is somewhat odd, but also follows from the behaviour we have right now
with empty modules:

    package p.foo
    bar if false

this also gives data.p the extent {"foo": {}}.

This could be worked around by recording, in the rule tree, when a node was
added because it's an intermediary with no values, but only children.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan.renatus@gmail.com>
2022-10-14 10:15:54 +02:00
Stephan Renatus 7e502930df ast+topdown+planner: replacement of non-built-in functions via 'with' (#4616)
Follow-up to #4540

We can now mock functions that are user-defined:

    package test

    f(_) = 1 {
        input.x = "x"
    }
    p = y {
        y := f(1) with f as 2
    }

...following the same scoping rules as laid out for built-in mocks.
The replacement can be a value (replacing all calls), or a built-in,
or another non-built-in function.

Also addresses bugs in the previous slice:
* topdown/evalCall: account for empty rules result from indexer
* topdown/eval: capture value replacement in PE could panic

Note: in PE, we now drop 'with' for function mocks of any kind:

These are always fully replaced in the saved support modules, so
this should be OK.

When keeping them, we'd also have to either copy the existing definitions
into the support module; or create a function stub in it.

Fixes #4449.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan.renatus@gmail.com>
2022-04-28 09:55:01 +02:00
Stephan Renatus 8f4986946c ast+topdown+planner: allow for mocking built-in functions via "with" (#4540)
With this change, we can replace calls to built-in functions via `with`. The replacement
can either be a value -- which will be used as the return value for every call to the
mocked built-in -- or a reference to a non-built-in function -- when the results need
to depend on the call's arguments.

Compiler, topdown, and planner have been adapted in this change. The included
docs changes describe the replacement options further.

Fixes first part of #4449. (Missing are non-built-in functions as mock targets.)

Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan.renatus@gmail.com>
2022-04-24 10:54:45 +02:00
Stephan Renatus d7af056a7c wasm: fix with handling in call_indirect optimization (#3109)
Recursively planning all the rules we've found in the optimization
case will make this happen:

Assume we're optimizing the call for data.foo[x] where x is a "seen"
variable. If we have rules for data.foo[x] (for some `x`) that involve
`with` statements, that bumps the funcstack generation in the planner.
The any subsequent planned rule for data.foo[x] will keep using that
bumped 'gen'; and it will eventually cause the CallDynamicStmt's first
path element -- 'gen' -- to not match any of those functions.
(Descriptions are difficult, there's a test case :D)

Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan.renatus@gmail.com>
2021-01-29 16:24:25 +01:00
Torin Sandall 5f2b72ef81 wasm: Update planner to support with keyword
This change updates the planner to support the with keyword in
Rego. When the planner encounters a with keyword it plans the
statement value and then temporarily replaces the local referred to in
the statement's target. While the statement is executing the plan sees
the replaced value. Once the statement finishes and execution
continues to the next statement, the local is restored.

This change modifies how rules are planned to handle 'with' statements
that apply to the 'data' document. Previously all rules were planned
up-front in one-shot. This worked because the set of virtual documents
visible to any given expression was static and would not change during
planning. The 'with' keyword changes this because 'with' statements
can be applied to the 'data' document that change set of virtual
documents visible to the expression. To deal with this the planner has
been updated to plan rules on-the-fly depth-first when references to
virtual documents are encountered. On top of this, the planner will
re-plan rules when 'with' statements against the 'data' document are
encountered. This approach was taken because while it increases the
size of the generated plan it keeps evaluation relatively simple: we
don't have to propagate context through the call stack to determine
whether a with modifier is in-place before executing call statements.

The other part of the planner implementation that was modified is the
trie that stores rules. The planned functions have been moved out of
the trie and are simply stored on the policy plan/result and the
mapping from virtual document path to function name has been moved
into a separate structure (funcstack). This change was made simplify
the data structures and improve maintainability. This change can be
revisited in the future if needed without any impact on generated
plans.

Fixes #1116

Signed-off-by: Torin Sandall <torinsandall@gmail.com>
2019-11-06 13:56:17 -05:00