docs(skills): repair stale file references in bundled skills (#120042)

This commit is contained in:
Peter Steinberger
2026-08-06 15:57:41 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 725f50b883
commit 7729100775
4 changed files with 44 additions and 39 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Use this for Control UI changes that need a real browser flow with deterministic
- Target one E2E test in a Codex worktree:
```bash
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs run --config test/vitest/vitest.ui-e2e.config.ts --configLoader runner ui/src/ui/e2e/chat-flow.e2e.test.ts
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs run --config test/vitest/vitest.ui-e2e.config.ts --configLoader runner ui/src/e2e/chat-flow.messaging.e2e.test.ts
```
- Run the whole local lane in a normal checkout:
@@ -7,22 +7,30 @@ description: Investigate OpenClaw pnpm test memory growth, Vitest OOMs, RSS spik
Use this skill for test-memory investigations. Do not guess from RSS alone when heap snapshots are available. Treat snapshot-name deltas as triage evidence, not proof, until retainers or dominators support the call.
For **runtime fixes** (e.g., closure leaks in long-running services like the gateway), see [Validating runtime fixes](#validating-runtime-fixes-not-test-memory) below — that uses a dedicated harness, not the test-parallel snapshot machinery.
Read `../openclaw-test-performance/SKILL.md` first for the current test-performance commands and proof routing.
For **runtime fixes** (e.g., closure leaks in long-running services like the gateway), see [Validating runtime fixes](#validating-runtime-fixes-not-test-memory) below — that uses a dedicated harness rather than the unit-test profiling workflow.
## Workflow
1. Reproduce the failing shape first.
- Match the real entrypoint if possible. For Linux CI-style unit failures, start with:
- `pnpm canvas:a2ui:bundle && OPENCLAW_TEST_MEMORY_TRACE=1 OPENCLAW_TEST_HEAPSNAPSHOT_INTERVAL_MS=60000 OPENCLAW_TEST_HEAPSNAPSHOT_DIR=.tmp/heapsnap OPENCLAW_TEST_WORKERS=2 OPENCLAW_TEST_MAX_OLD_SPACE_SIZE_MB=6144 pnpm test`
- Keep `OPENCLAW_TEST_MEMORY_TRACE=1` enabled so the wrapper prints per-file RSS summaries alongside the snapshots.
- If the report is about a specific shard or worker budget, preserve that shape.
- Before you analyze snapshots, identify the real lane names from `[test-parallel] start ...` lines or `pnpm test --plan`. Do not assume a single `unit-fast` lane; local plans often split into `unit-fast-batch-*`.
- Match the real entrypoint and worker budget. For a broad unit-fast baseline with per-config max RSS and top-file timing, start with:
2. Wait for repeated snapshots before concluding anything.
- Take at least two intervals from the same lane.
- Compare snapshots from the same PID inside the real lane directory such as `.tmp/heapsnap/unit-fast-batch-2/`.
- Use `.agents/skills/openclaw-test-heap-leaks/scripts/heapsnapshot-delta.mjs` to compare either two files directly or the earliest/latest pair per PID in one lane directory.
- If the helper suggests transformed-module retention, confirm the top entries in DevTools retainers/dominators before calling it solved.
```bash
pnpm test:perf:groups \
--config test/vitest/vitest.unit-fast.config.ts \
--allow-failures \
--output .artifacts/test-perf/unit-fast-memory.json
```
- For a suspected file, rerun that file with one worker and collect wall/RSS evidence: `/usr/bin/time -l pnpm test <file> --maxWorkers=1 --reporter=verbose`.
- Current `pnpm test` execution is planned by `scripts/test-projects.mjs`. Record the printed Vitest config or shard and preserve that shape when the report is configuration- or worker-budget-specific.
2. Collect the strongest available heap evidence.
- Run `pnpm test:perf:profile:runner -- --output-dir .artifacts/test-perf/vitest-runner-profile -- <file>` for a CPU profile plus a sampling heap profile of the unit runner. Open the heap profile in DevTools and inspect the largest allocation families.
- Sampling `.heapprofile` output is not a `.heapsnapshot`; do not pass it to the snapshot delta helper.
- When a dedicated harness or another known producer emits repeated `.heapsnapshot` files, compare snapshots from the same PID with `.agents/skills/openclaw-test-heap-leaks/scripts/heapsnapshot-delta.mjs`.
- If no snapshot or heap profile is available, RSS growth is useful triage evidence, but keep the leak classification inconclusive.
3. Classify the growth before choosing a fix.
- If growth is dominated by Vite/Vitest transformed source strings, `Module`, `system / Context`, bytecode, descriptor arrays, or property maps, treat it as likely retained module graph growth in long-lived workers.
@@ -31,25 +39,23 @@ For **runtime fixes** (e.g., closure leaks in long-running services like the gat
4. Fix the right layer.
- For likely retained transformed-module growth in shared workers:
- Prefer timing and hotspot-driven scheduling fixes first. Check whether the file is already represented in `test/fixtures/test-timings.unit.json` and whether `scripts/test-update-memory-hotspots.mjs` should refresh the measured hotspot manifest before hand-editing behavior overrides.
- Move hotspot files out of the real shared lane by updating `test/fixtures/test-parallel.behavior.json` only when timing-driven peeling is insufficient.
- Prefer `singletonIsolated` for files that are safe alone but inflate shared worker heaps.
- If the file should already have been peeled out by timings but is absent from `test/fixtures/test-timings.unit.json`, call that out explicitly. Missing timings are a scheduling blind spot.
- Inspect the owning Vitest config and the process chunking in `scripts/test-projects.test-support.mjs`. Fix process lifetime or project ownership there only when the same-shape evidence shows that shared-worker retention is the cause.
- `test/vitest/vitest.unit-fast-isolated.config.ts` is for audited stateful tests that need a fresh module graph. Do not use it as a generic memory-hotspot list.
- For real leaks:
- Patch the implicated test or runtime cleanup path.
- Look for missing `afterEach`/`afterAll`, module-reset gaps, retained global state, unreleased DB handles, or listeners/timers that survive the file.
5. Verify with the most direct proof.
- Re-run the targeted lane or file with heap snapshots enabled if the suite still finishes in reasonable time.
- If snapshot overhead pushes tests over Vitest timeouts, fall back to the same lane without snapshots and confirm the RSS trend or OOM is reduced.
- For wrapper-only changes, at minimum verify the expected lanes start and the snapshot files are written.
- Re-run the same grouped or scoped command and confirm the max-RSS trend or OOM is reduced.
- When a dedicated producer emits heap profiles or snapshots, repeat the same producer and compare equivalent artifacts.
- For routing or config changes, verify the expected Vitest config or shard starts and the affected tests complete.
## Heuristics
- Do not call everything a leak. In this repo, large `unit-fast` or `unit-fast-batch-*` growth can be a worker-lifetime problem rather than an application object leak.
- `scripts/test-parallel.mjs` and `scripts/test-parallel-memory.mjs` are the primary control points for wrapper diagnostics.
- The lane names printed by `[test-parallel] start ...` and `[test-parallel][mem] summary ...` tell you where to focus.
- When one or two files account for most of the delta and they are missing from timings, reducing impact by isolating them is usually the first pragmatic fix.
- Do not call everything a leak. Growth in a non-isolated shared Vitest project can be a worker-lifetime problem rather than an application object leak.
- `scripts/test-projects.mjs`, `scripts/test-group-report.mjs`, and `scripts/run-vitest-profile.mjs` are the current execution, grouped-RSS, and profile entrypoints.
- The `[test] starting ...` lines identify the Vitest config or shard to reproduce.
- `.artifacts/vitest-shard-timings.json` stores config/shard durations for scheduling. It is not a file-level memory-hotspot or behavior manifest.
- When the same retained object families grow across multiple intervals in the same worker PID, trust the snapshots over intuition, then confirm ambiguous calls with retainer evidence.
## Snapshot Comparison
@@ -57,13 +63,13 @@ For **runtime fixes** (e.g., closure leaks in long-running services like the gat
- Direct comparison:
- `node .agents/skills/openclaw-test-heap-leaks/scripts/heapsnapshot-delta.mjs before.heapsnapshot after.heapsnapshot`
- Auto-select earliest/latest snapshots per PID within one lane:
- `node .agents/skills/openclaw-test-heap-leaks/scripts/heapsnapshot-delta.mjs --lane-dir .tmp/heapsnap/unit-fast-batch-2`
- `node .agents/skills/openclaw-test-heap-leaks/scripts/heapsnapshot-delta.mjs --lane-dir <snapshot-directory>`
- Useful flags:
- `--top 40`
- `--min-kb 32`
- `--pid 16133`
Read the top positive deltas first. Large positive growth in module-transform artifacts suggests lane isolation; large positive growth in runtime objects suggests a real leak. If the names alone do not settle it, open the same snapshot pair in DevTools and inspect retainers/dominators for the top rows before declaring root cause.
Read the top positive deltas first. Large positive growth in module-transform artifacts points to shared-process lifetime or project ownership; large positive growth in runtime objects suggests a real leak. If the names alone do not settle it, open the same snapshot pair in DevTools and inspect retainers/dominators for the top rows before declaring root cause.
## Validating runtime fixes (not test-memory)
@@ -102,8 +108,8 @@ scope of the function where the leak lives, not be a generic abort-loop.
When using this skill, report:
- The exact reproduce command.
- Which lane and PID were compared.
- The dominant retained object families from the snapshot delta.
- Which Vitest config or target was reproduced, and which PID was compared when snapshots were available.
- The dominant retained object families from the heap profile or snapshot delta, when available.
- Whether the issue is a likely real leak or likely shared-worker retained module growth, plus whether retainers/dominators confirmed it.
- The concrete fix or impact-reduction patch.
- What you verified, and what snapshot overhead prevented you from verifying.
@@ -16,8 +16,9 @@ guesswork.
- `src/channels/AGENTS.md` and `src/plugins/AGENTS.md` for plugin/channel
laziness.
- `src/gateway/AGENTS.md` for server lifecycle tests.
- `test/helpers/AGENTS.md` and `test/helpers/channels/AGENTS.md` for shared
contract helpers.
- `test/helpers/AGENTS.md` and
`src/channels/plugins/contracts/test-helpers/AGENTS.md` for shared contract
helpers.
- `src/infra/outbound/AGENTS.md` for outbound/media/action tests.
2. Establish a baseline before changing code:
- Prefer `pnpm test:perf:groups --full-suite --allow-failures --output <file>`
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ same command. For Testbox comparisons, use the same `tbx_...` id when possible.
| import duration | broad barrel/runtime loads | `OPENCLAW_VITEST_IMPORT_DURATIONS=1` |
| max RSS | memory pressure and OOM risk | `/usr/bin/time -l`, `pnpm test:extensions:memory`, wrapper memory summaries |
| CPU/user/sys | CPU-bound vs wait-bound split | `/usr/bin/time -l` locally, Testbox job timing when local CPU is noisy |
| heap snapshots | real leak vs retained module graph | `openclaw-test-heap-leaks` workflow |
| heap evidence | real leak vs retained module graph | `openclaw-test-heap-leaks` workflow |
Local scoped command with CPU/RSS:
@@ -137,12 +138,12 @@ pnpm test:extensions:memory -- --extension discord --extension telegram --skip-c
Heap/RSS escalation:
```bash
OPENCLAW_TEST_MEMORY_TRACE=1 \
OPENCLAW_TEST_HEAPSNAPSHOT_INTERVAL_MS=60000 \
OPENCLAW_TEST_HEAPSNAPSHOT_DIR=.tmp/heapsnap \
OPENCLAW_TEST_WORKERS=2 \
OPENCLAW_TEST_MAX_OLD_SPACE_SIZE_MB=6144 \
pnpm test
pnpm test:perf:groups \
--config test/vitest/vitest.unit-fast.config.ts \
--allow-failures \
--output .artifacts/test-perf/unit-fast-memory.json
pnpm test:perf:profile:runner -- \
--output-dir .artifacts/test-perf/vitest-runner-profile -- <file>
```
Use `openclaw-test-heap-leaks` when RSS keeps growing across intervals, workers
@@ -170,8 +171,6 @@ leak until snapshots or retainers support it.
- Runtime/default model/auth selection paid by idle snapshots or fixtures.
- Plugin-owned media/action discovery triggered before checking whether args
contain plugin-owned fields.
- Timings missing from `test/fixtures/test-timings.unit.json`, causing hotspot
files to stay in shared workers.
- Parallel Vitest runs sharing `node_modules/.experimental-vitest-cache` without
distinct `OPENCLAW_VITEST_FS_MODULE_CACHE_PATH` values.
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ node --import tsx scripts/openclaw-npm-postpublish-verify.ts <published-version>
`OPENAI_API_KEY` and `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`. If either cannot be injected, stop
before starting those local long lanes and report the missing key.
- Live credentialed channel QA is the GitHub Actions workflow
`QA-Lab - All Lanes` (`.github/workflows/qa-live-telegram-convex.yml`), not a
`QA-Lab - All Lanes` (`.github/workflows/qa-live-transports-convex.yml`), not a
local substitute. Dispatch it from Actions against the release tag and wait
for it to pass before npm preflight/publish readiness. Use a SHA only when it
satisfies the workflow's secret-bearing trust gate: main ancestor or open PR